IPC 224 → BNS 262: Resistance to Apprehension

Quick Summary: IPC 224 vs BNS 262

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, in force since 1 July 2024, has replaced the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860. IPC 224 addresses resistance to apprehension, part of the IPC's offences against public justice — false evidence, fabrication, screening offenders and similar interference with the justice process. These are carried into the BNS with the same structure, and resistance to apprehension is now prosecuted as BNS 262, protecting the integrity of investigations and trials in its own right.

What did IPC 224 cover?

IPC 224 dealt with resistance to apprehension — resistance or obstruction by a person to his lawful apprehension. Until 30 June 2024, every FIR and criminal trial for this offence was registered and prosecuted under this provision of the Indian Penal Code 1860.

BNS 262: What changed in the new law?

No major change. From 1 July 2024, new complaints relating to resistance to apprehension are filed under BNS Section 262, while cases registered earlier continue under the old IPC provision as per the saving clause of the BNS.

Punishment under BNS 262

Same - Up to 2 years

Practical implications for advocates, police & citizens

• Advocates: In a resistance to apprehension matter, intention and the materiality of the false statement are decisive; ensure the complaint cites BNS 262 and meets the pre-conditions for prosecuting court-related offences.
• Police officers: Document the false statement or fabricated evidence precisely — the resistance to apprehension offence is now BNS 262.
• Law students & citizens: Lying on oath, forging evidence or helping an offender escape — the conduct behind resistance to apprehension — is punishable separately from the main case.