468
Forgery for Cheating
Forgery for purpose of cheating
IPC ⇄ BNS Converter
Instant section lookup
FIR Decoder
Decode your FIR sections
Bail Checker
Bailable or not? Instant
Punishment Calculator
Jail + fine exposure
IPC → BNS Quiz
Test your knowledge
Comparison Chart
Top 50 IPC↔BNS · PDF ready
All 575 Sections
Searchable directory
Bailable vs Non-Bailable
Quick offence lookup
BNS Chapters
All 20 chapters
IPC Section 468 (Forgery for Cheating) under the old Indian Penal Code 1860 is now covered under Section 336(3) of the new Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, effective from 1 July 2024.
Forgery for purpose of cheating
IPC 468 (Forgery for Cheating) — forgery for purpose of cheating — now maps to BNS Section 336(3). Key change: No major change. Punishment under BNS 336(3): Same - Up to 7 years.
IPC Section 468 punishes forgery committed with the intention that the forged document or electronic record shall be used for the purpose of cheating. From 1 July 2024 it continues as Section 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023.
Imprisonment up to 7 years, and fine. Because the forgery is aimed at cheating, the law treats it more seriously than ordinary forgery; the penalty is unchanged from old IPC 468.
There is no major change — the offence and 7-year punishment carry over, with the numbering moving from IPC 468 to BNS 336(3). The express inclusion of electronic records keeps the section relevant to digital and document fraud. New FIRs cite BNS 336(3).
A forges a salary slip and a bank statement so that he can obtain a loan he is not entitled to. Because the forgery was created specifically to cheat the lender, the act falls under BNS 336(3) rather than the lighter ordinary-forgery provision.
IPC Section 468 (Forgery for Cheating) is now covered under Section 336(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023, effective from 1 July 2024.
Same - Up to 7 years
No major change
No. The Indian Penal Code 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 on 1 July 2024. The forgery for cheating offence earlier in IPC 468 is now governed by BNS 336(3) — pending IPC 468 cases continue, but new FIRs cite BNS 336(3).
Executive Summary & Deep Dive Analysis of Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India with BNS comparison.
Executive Summary & Deep Dive Analysis of Teesta Setalvad vs. State of Gujarat with BNS comparison.
Authoritative commentary on the new criminal laws — essential for advocates & students.